Luxury stocks can outperform during recession

April 20, 20233 Comments

Products made by luxury brand makers, and their stocks, tend to hold their value over the longer term due to limited production. A deep recession can pressure sales of many in these goods. But select companies selling products to the very upper end of the market are less affected. The desire by elite/uber-wealthy consumers and political elites to use wealth, influence or power – for exotic vacations or high end products can provide you with recession-proof stock performance.

The desire by such individuals to own prestigious products or élite services doesn’t dissipate compared to those who need to tighten their belts during recessions. As is said:  The rich stay rich. Have-nots to have-yachts, as Pierre Poilievre put it. The wealthy (happily spending their long accumulated wealth) and political elites (happily spending your tax dollars) are not the ones running out of money in a recession. Today, I wanted to look at a few luxury-brand stocks selling to that upper-end consumer, and see if there are opportunities in them. We’ll look at how their stocks have fared in recession, and are faring now.

What to look for in a recession-resistant luxury stock

To start, there are many publicly listed stocks that are considered “luxury brand” companies. Many of these brands are not necessarily selling to upper end consumers. As such, they can be very cyclical. This, as “well-off”, but not “wealthy”, consumers back off on purchases during recession. For example, Ralph Lauren (RL-US), Tapestry, makers of  Coach, Kate Spade New York and Stuart Weitzman (TPR-US), and Fossil (FOSL-US) don’t attract the “elite” consumer to their brands so much as upper-middle-class consumers. This shows in their charts. FOSL, below, epitomizes the volatility of that market.

We can see how the stock sunk in anticipation and reaction to economic recession in 2008 and 2020. The stock also felt pressure in the 2016-2018 era as newly elected President Donald Trump’s trade war with China began, alongside the slowdown in global economic growth and concern that the Federal Reserve was raising interest rates too quickly at that time.

So, which luxury stocks should an investor be looking at – assuming a recession is looming? Here are a few at the uber- upper-end of the consumer spectrum that may fit the bill.


Many luxury brand car makers are part of a larger group, and thus cannot be viewed in isolation in a single stock. For example, Porsche and Audi are intermingled within the greater Volkswagen group, so they can’t be isolated. As an aside, I expect to soon list my well loved and maintained low mileage 2003 Porsche 911 turbo X50 – enquire using the contact button if interested (note: its not at the elite, have-yacht price level!).  Anyhow – Ferrari is at the very pointy end of the wealth market. The company sells their very pricey cars exclusively to customers with historical record of repeat purchases with them. That model seems to work, as the chart below suggests.

Note that, beyond interim corrections, the stock rose during the 2016-18 period, and 2020. As the current talk of recession looms, the stock is making new highs! This, as the company reports higher revenue and higher earnings per unit sold (an astounding $106k/ unit!!). Yikes!

Not so good for Mercedes and BMW

Mercedes Benz is listed as an OTC US stock under the ticker MBGYY. BMW is listed OTC as BMW. As noted above, the stocks that seem less volatile during recessions service the very high end of the wealth spectrum. Look around in the town you live in, and you will see plenty of BMW, Audi, and Mercedes cars. These are not exclusive cars to the elite, such as Ferrari. Not to say that they do not sell to the elite consumer. Witness the Mercedes Benz “Black” edition cars, and the BMW “M” cars. But their consumers largely lie within the “upper-middle” end of the spectrum, or wanna-be’s. As such, when recession arises, more modestly financed folks are inclined to move from a BMW 7-series into a less profitable car within the companies offerings (eg-BMW 3 or 5 series, or Mercedes A-class or CLA’s).  Or to move into a domestic or Japanese offering. The chart below highlights this.

Louis Vuitton

Upper end fashion purse and bag maker from France,  LVMUY, is another brand that appeals to Hollywood types and the uber-elites of the world. These very high-end luxury products are exclusive to the buyer with deep pockets. No discount outlet-center sales for this company! Clearly, this is another stock that is less impacted by recessions.



One last stock with a reputation of selling to the elite. Kering – listed as PPRUY on the OTC market, makes uber-upper-end Gucci bags, belts, shoes, etc. Like Louis Vuitton, the Gucci brand, and others under the Kering umbrella, are coveted by the elite. The chart below illustrates strength during its short history – especially during periods of economic slowing.



Obviously, I haven’t listed all of the uber-elite public companies here. The concept that you want to be considering, if interested in the trade, is this: For recession resistant stocks, we should identify exclusive providers of these products and services that focus almost entirely on the pointy-end of the wealth curve. I’d be very interested in hearing your feedback if you are aware of stocks that might fit that niche leave your comments below!


  • No doubt, Louis Vutton, Hermes and more can live outside the real world of interest
    rates, and pricing adjustment, as Tesla had to do this week, to preserve market share that is
    eroded by competing e-vehicles.

    But for other mortals, what are your thoughts on Lithium production being nationalized in Chile, affecting mainly SQM (NYSE) but also Albermarle (ALB, NYSE) ? Teck.B (TSX) also has a presence there, with the Quebrada Blanca copper mine in northern Chile and the Carmen de Andacollo copper mine in central Chile. Is copper and the Canadian copper giant next on the communist manifesto agenda there, causing huge losses to Canadian investors ? Will Glencore still want to acquire TecK if both mines are taken from Teck ? If this happens, Teck.b may trade down $20 per down, in 1-2 hours trading in the coming weeks, as happened with Lithium. Here in Canada, there was discussion of the Federal government bringing the Natives into the fold of mineral extraction agreements that are over 60 years old, in Alberta, Saskachewan, etc.

    • Mike – from Craig, VT Fundamental analyst & CFA:

      “I think they apply to all commodity rich countries….even/incl. Cda.

      Teck is like many commodity centered corporations that operate and mine in disputed jurisdictions. When situations arise that question the ownership/rights of resources in a country it is a reminder that political risk is real. Often the pollical risk of a country with an unstable, government is more easily recognizable. However a change in the ruling party of a country, to a more socialist leadership can also be very disruptive to corporate capital assets.
      It is a fine balance for a corporation to invest capital in a commodity dependent country. They invest time, people and of course funds. Teck has been in the region for a long time. The expectation is that they are intimately involved and aware of the political landscape.”

  • Great insight. Time to hold not sell, the Teck.B, as you say, in this case. Appreciate the input.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Never miss another blog post!

Get the SmartBounce blog posts delivered directly to your inbox.



Recent Posts

Keith's On Demand Technical Analysis course is now available online

Scroll to Top